10-Year Trends in Lipoprotein(a) Testing in Queensland and Australia: A Retrospective Analysis of Ordering Patterns

Caroline A E Bachmeier1, Greg J Ward2, Ashley Arnott2

  • 1The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Department of Biochemistry, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Endocrinology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Insights

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] testing has increased significantly in Australia over the past decade. However, testing rates remain low, highlighting the need for broader implementation and clinician awareness for cardiovascular disease risk management.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a key atherogenic lipoprotein linked to cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis.
  • Elevated Lp(a) levels necessitate aggressive cardiovascular risk factor management.
  • Emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies underscore the importance of identifying individuals with high Lp(a).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in Lp(a) testing rates in Queensland, Australia, from 2015 to 2024.
  • To assess the impact of evolving guidelines and emerging therapies on Lp(a) testing.
  • To identify barriers to widespread Lp(a) testing.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of laboratory data from a major tertiary referral center.
  • Evaluation of Lp(a) test volumes over a 10-year period (2015-2024).
  • Comparison of testing rates relative to the screened population.

Main Results:

  • Significant increase in annual Lp(a) test volumes in Queensland and Australia.
  • Test numbers rose from 652 to 4,364 in Queensland and 2,686 to 23,135 nationally between 2015 and 2024.
  • Despite increases, testing rates remained low, with testing often occurring late in life.

Conclusions:

  • Substantial growth in Lp(a) testing observed, driven by increased awareness, guideline changes, and new therapies.
  • Overall testing rates remain limited, indicating a need for improved access and awareness.
  • Wider adoption of guideline-based testing and enhanced clinician education are crucial for timely patient identification and management.
Abstract