Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Detecting warning signs for psychopathology in real time while accounting for context: Two novel statistical process
M J Schreuder1,2,3, E Schat4, E Ceulemans4
1Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. mariekeschreuder@gmail.com.
Statistical process control (SPC) can detect emotional changes for depression but ignores context. Novel context-sensitive SPC methods improve accuracy by adjusting for factors like stress or weekends, reducing false alarms and negatives.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Data analysis
- Mental health technology
Background:
- Statistical process control (SPC) shows potential for real-time depression detection through emotion monitoring.
- Standard SPC methods fail to account for contextual influences on emotions, leading to inaccuracies.
- Contextual factors like stress or weekends can cause false alarms or mask warning signs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate novel context-sensitive statistical process control (SPC) methods.
- To address the limitations of standard SPC in emotion monitoring by incorporating contextual factors.
- To improve the accuracy of real-time depression detection systems.
Main Methods:
- Development of two novel context-sensitive SPC algorithms.
- Simulation studies to compare context-sensitive SPC with standard SPC.
- Empirical illustration using real-world emotional data and contextual information.
Main Results:
- Context-sensitive SPC methods outperform standard SPC when contextual effects are significant and depression effects are small.
- Performance advantage diminishes if contextual factors are biased.
- Empirical data confirmed the simulation findings.
Conclusions:
- Context-sensitive SPC methods offer improved accuracy for emotion monitoring and depression detection.
- These methods are recommended when contextual factors (e.g., location, time) can be reliably identified.
- Accurate contextualization is key to reducing false alarms and enhancing the reliability of mental health monitoring tools.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
05:52Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Naturalistic Observations
Empathy
Self-Awareness and Its Effects