Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.8K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.9K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.9K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Labor Supply, Risk Aversion, and Conflict Uncertainty.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Attribution as a Conditional Reasoning Step in Multifactorial Risk Analysis and Decision-Making.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Risk Without Values: Including Indigenous Perspectives in Climate Risk Assessments.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

What if the Risk Manager is Malevolent?

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of Communication Strategies on Risk Perception in Technoscience: A Systematic Literature Review Through an Argumentation Theory Approach.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

The Roles of Place Attachment and Geovisualizations on Hurricane Storm Surge Risk Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

8.6K

How Communication of Scientific Uncertainty Affects Trust in Science-A Systematic Review.

Christian Schuster1, Andreas M Scheu2

  • 1Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Berlin, Germany.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Communicating scientific uncertainty generally builds trust in science. However, careful communication is vital, especially on sensitive topics, to prevent misinformation and distrust.

Keywords:
disinformationscientific uncertaintysystematic reviewtrust in scienceuncertainty communication

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

14.6K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

8.6K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

14.6K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Science communication
  • Trust in science
  • Societal challenges

Background:

  • Trust in science is crucial for addressing societal issues like climate change and health crises.
  • Communicating scientific uncertainty is increasingly important due to rapid scientific advancement and disinformation.
  • Understanding the impact of uncertainty communication on public trust is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review evidence on how external communication of scientific uncertainty affects trust in science.
  • To identify trends and influencing factors in the diverse field of uncertainty communication.
  • To provide recommendations for science communication practice.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of scientific literature.
  • Inclusion of 24 articles representing the core evidence.
  • Broad definitions and search strings to capture diverse research.

Main Results:

  • Communicating scientific uncertainty generally enhances trust in science.
  • Downplaying uncertainty can lead to distrust.
  • Risks exist, particularly when audiences are personally affected or issues are politically sensitive.

Conclusions:

  • Open communication of scientific uncertainty positively impacts trust.
  • Careful audience analysis and monitoring of public reception are critical.
  • Proactive management of misinterpretations and misinformation is necessary, especially in digital spaces.