Predicting ART initiation through intertemporal preferences: development and validation of a decision-making preferences scale for ART initiation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Sisi Fan1, Yaqin Zhou2, Ting Zhao1
1Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Given persistent and unpredictable delays in antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation globally, this study develops a decision preference scale to identify patients at risk of such delays and evaluates its psychometric properties. METHODS: Guided by the intertemporal decision-making framework, the scale development followed a triphasic approach. In Phase I, we conceptualized decision-making preferences for ART initiation through theoretical synthesis, systematic literature review, and in-depth qualitative interviews. In Phase II, we generated and optimized the items through group discussions, Delphi expert consultations, and Pilot test. Phase III implemented psychometric evaluations: (1) content validity (Item-Content Validity Index [I-CVI] and Scale-Content Validity Index [S-CVI]); (2) structural validity (Exploratory Factor Analysis [EFA] and Confirmatory Factor Analysis [CFA]); (3) predictive validity (e.g., Odds Ratio [OR], Receiver Operating Characteristic [ROC] curve with Area Under the Curve [AUC]); (4) reliability. RESULTS: The scale comprises 16 items across two theoretically derived dimensions: short-term costs and long-term benefits. The content validity is adequate (I-CVIs range from 0.830 to 1.000; S-CVI = 0.949). EFA extracted two factors with a cumulative variance explanation of 66.667%, and CFA shows an excellent model fit. The adjusted scale performed well in predicting ART initiation (OR = 0.745, p < 0.001 logistic regression; AUC = 0.895, p < 0.001 ROC curve analysis). The optimal classification threshold (≥ 2), derived from the Youden index achieved balanced diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity = 81.5%; specificity = 80.9%; precision = 92.0%). Finally, the reliability of the scale is acceptable, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.786 for the total scale, a split-half reliability of 0.908, and a test-retest reliability of 0.837. CONCLUSIONS: The Decision-Making Preferences Scale for ART Initiation is a validated and reliable tool that helps providers systematically identify high-risk patients enabling timely interventions to reduce delays. Future research is warranted to evaluate its external validity in other geographical settings and among broader populations.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Hindsight Biases
Framing Effects
First Impression
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
The Availability Heuristic

