The Dutch debate on youth psychiatric euthanasia and suicide prevention

The debate on euthanasia for mental suffering in young people in The Netherlands has become highly polarised, with a novel, apparently epidemiological argument taking centre stage: that psychiatric euthanasia is necessary to prevent suicide. This article evaluates that claim. Using data from 353 young applicants (annual suicide risk 2.9%) and optimistic assumptions (80% sensitivity and specificity), the number needed to treat was 10 and the number needed to harm 9. Thus, ten youths would need to undergo assisted dying to prevent one suicide, and nine would die without a preventive purpose having been served. Empirically and ethically, the prevention argument does not appear to hold; real prevention requires other, previously well-debated factors such as relational continuity, trauma-informed care and social inclusion in response to mental suffering.