Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
Outcomes and Management of Pregnancies Screening Positive for Microdeletions 22q11.2, 15q11.2, 1p36, 4p, or 5p: A
D Claire Miller1, Devika Chawla1, Summer Pierson1
1Clinical Development, Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Purpose:
To compare pregnancy outcomes and management between patients screening positive for five microdeletions (microdeletion screen-positive, MDS+) and patients screening negative (microdeletion screen-negative, MDS-).
Patients And Methods:
Patients who received a prenatal cell-free DNA (pcfDNA) test that screens for microdeletions 22q11.2, 15q11.2, 1p36, 4p, and 5p and results were linked to de-identified insurance claims. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to assess outcomes. Logistic and Poisson regression with adjustment for prior high-risk pregnancy and payer type were used to compare pregnancy outcomes and management in those with MDS+ and MDS- results.
Results:
A total of 119 MDS+ patients and 287,169 MDS- patients were eligible for analysis. During pregnancy, MDS+ patients were more likely than MDS- patients to have polyhydramnios (18.5% in MDS+ vs. 3.4% in MDS-; OR=6.3 [95% CI: 3.8-10.1]; p<0.001) and fetal growth restriction (22.2% in MDS+ vs. 10.4% in MDS-; OR=2.4 [95% CI: 1.5-3.7]; p<0.001). MDS+ patients were more likely to experience pregnancy loss (OR=3.2; 95% CI: 1.3-6.3; p=0.004) or terminate the pregnancy (OR=22.2 [95% CI: 8.6-46.8]; p<0.001). Among patients with a live birth, MDS+ were more likely to have a preterm delivery (25.0% in MDS+ vs. 15.4% in MDS-; OR=1.8 [95% CI: 1.0-3.0]; p=0.04). MDS+ patients had increased pregnancy management, including more invasive diagnostic testing (13.4% in MDS+ vs. 0.5% in MDS-; OR=31.0 [95% CI: 17.5-51.1]; p<0.001) and more frequent echocardiograms (RR=1.5 [95% CI: 1.2, 1.9]; p<0.001) compared to MDS- pregnancies.
Conclusion:
MDS+ pregnancies had elevated rates of ultrasound abnormalities, pregnancy loss, preterm birth, and pregnancy management as compared to an MDS- control group. These findings support the clinical utility of microdeletion screening in prenatal care.
More Related Videos
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
09:30Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Karyotyping
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Pleiotropy