Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Extent of Open Science Practices in the Reporting of Real World Evidence Research
Lillian Liu1, Louisa Jorm1, Nahee Kim1
1Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW Australia.
Introduction:
Open sharing of research methods and software code is fundamental to open science principles and reproducible research practices and has long been the norm in some scientific disciplines. Increasingly, scientific publishers are introducing policies to encourage or mandate sharing of research protocols and analytical code. Code sharing is especially important when research data cannot be shared, as is often the case in research using population data. However, the prevalence of protocol and code sharing in population data science research has been underexplored.
Objectives:
To assess open science practice usage by authors in real world evidence (RWE) research published in the International Journal of Population Data Science (IJPDS).
Method:
We reviewed RWE research articles publishing estimates of associations in the IJPDS from January 2019 to October 2024. We determined the proportion of published articles reporting (i) a link to a study protocol, (ii) a link to a pre-registered study protocol, (iii) a statement about the availability of the data, (iv) a link to the analytical code, and (iv) reference to a reporting checklist or guideline.
Results:
None of the 41 eligible articles met all five open science domains. One article included a link to the study protocol and none cited a pre-registered protocol. Fourteen (34%) articles included a statement about data availability. No articles included a link to the analytical code, although one included it in supplementary material and two indicated availability on request. Five (12%) articles referred to using a reporting checklist. There was no clear evidence of increasing adoption of open science practices over time.
Conclusions:
Researcher alignment with international best practice for open science was poor among RWE articles published in IJPDS. Potential solutions to encourage an open science culture include increasing awareness through training and education, building Communities of Practice, providing incentives and implementing open science publication policies.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Ethics in Research
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Introduction to Epidemiology