Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
No Association Between Radiation Dose and Clinical Outcomes in Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the Veteran Population
Sudarshan Karki1, Cymon N Kersch2, Ryan A Melson3
1Portland VA Research Foundation, Portland, Oregon.
Purpose:
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer. Treatment often includes high-dose radiation therapy (RT); however, studies suggest that even 8 Gy in 1 fraction can provide local control.
Methods And Materials:
In this retrospective, IRB-approved study, we mined the national Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse for MCC patients treated with RT. Using a combination of manual chart review and semiautomated data extraction from free-text notes, we collected information on diagnosis, tumor site and size, treatment technique, and radiation dose/fractionation. We assessed local and distant tumor control and overall survival as a function of radiation dose.
Results:
We identified 324 patients with 618 treated sites that were evaluable. Of these, 386 sites were treated for microscopic disease and 232 for gross disease. Among the gross disease sites, 64 were treated with curative intent, 164 with palliative intent, and 4 with neoadjuvant intent. The 5-year local progression-free probability (LPFP) was 94.0% across the entire cohort, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year LPFP of 92%, 89%, and 86%, respectively, for patients with gross disease. Local tumor control was excellent across the entire spectrum of delivered radiation doses, ranging from 7.5 to 122.4 Gy (biologically effective dose, α/β = 10), both for sites with gross disease and those treated for microscopic disease risk. Local tumor control was 90% to 95% in both the highest and lowest RT dose groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard assessment of radiation dose showed no significant association with LPFP (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.97-1.01; P = .22 and hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02; P = .67, respectively). Distant progression-free probability was also independent of radiation dose.
Conclusions:
MCC is generally sensitive to RT, with traditionally palliative doses demonstrating similar local and distant disease control compared with higher dose regimens. Acknowledging several caveats to this work, these data support considering dose de-escalation as a treatment option for MCC.
