Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Objective performance goals after open and endovascular intervention for critical limb ischaemia
Eike Sebastian Debus1, Jasmin Epple2, Carl-Leon Reese1
1University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Department for Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
This study compared critical limb ischemia treatments, lower extremity bypass (LEB) and infrainguinal endovascular intervention (IEI), against Society for Vascular Surgery objective performance goals (OPG). Both LEB and IEI largely met OPGs, with no significant 5-year outcome differences.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) poses significant risks, necessitating effective treatment strategies.
- Lower extremity bypass (LEB) and infrainguinal endovascular intervention (IEI) are primary revascularization methods for CLI.
- The Society for Vascular Surgery established objective performance goals (OPGs) to benchmark treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if current real-world treatments for CLI, specifically LEB and IEI, align with established SVS OPGs.
- To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of LEB and IEI against OPG benchmarks.
- To assess amputation-free survival (AFS) and patient survival rates for both interventions.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed for studies published between 2010 and March 2021.
- Data from 82 publications on 35,981 IEI procedures and 49 publications on 26,707 LEB procedures were analyzed.
- Outcomes including perioperative adverse events, AFS, and patient survival were compared to SVS OPGs.
Main Results:
- Perioperative major adverse limb events showed no significant difference between IEI (9%) and LEB (10%) compared to OPG (8%).
- Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events were significantly better for both IEI (4%) and LEB (6%) than OPG (8%).
- One-year AFS was 71% for IEI and 77% for LEB, while patient survival was 78% for IEI and 84% for LEB, with varying statistical significance against OPGs. Five-year survival and AFS did not differ significantly between LEB and IEI.
Conclusions:
- Real-world outcomes for infrainguinal endovascular intervention (IEI) and lower extremity bypass (LEB) largely align with Society for Vascular Surgery objective performance goals (OPGs).
- No significant differences were observed in 5-year outcomes between LEB and IEI for critical limb ischemia.
- Both LEB and IEI represent viable treatment options for CLI, meeting established performance benchmarks.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management

