Use of uterine manipulators in endometrial cancer surgery: Balancing benefits and uncertainties

Marco D'Indinosante1, Matteo Bruno1, Fausto Napolitano2

  • 1Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00136, Roma, RM, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Intrauterine manipulators in hysterectomy for endometrial cancer show no survival detriment for early-stage disease. However, caution is advised due to potential increases in positive peritoneal cytology and lymphovascular space invasion.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Intrauterine manipulators are frequently used in minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
  • Concerns persist regarding their impact on tumor spillage and overall oncologic safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize comparative evidence on the oncologic outcomes associated with intrauterine manipulator use in endometrial cancer hysterectomy.
  • To address the debate surrounding tumor spillage and safety concerns.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted, including randomized trials, meta-analyses, and observational cohorts up to December 2025.
  • Analysis focused on peritoneal cytology, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes.

Main Results:

  • No significant detriment in disease-free or overall survival was observed for early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer with manipulator use.
  • However, a modest increase in positive peritoneal cytology (adjusted OR 1.7) and LVSI was noted in some studies.
  • Increased isolated vaginal vault recurrences were reported in specific cohorts, though operative safety was comparable.

Conclusions:

  • A universal oncologic hazard associated with intrauterine manipulators for early-stage, low-grade endometrial tumors may not exist.
  • Reliance on retrospective data necessitates caution.
  • A selective, technique-conscious approach is recommended until more definitive prospective data are available.

Related Concept Videos