Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026
Systematic Assessment of Mammalian Skull Specimens for Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology
Published on: August 22, 2022
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Forensic Odontology among Dental Practitioners
1Department of Oral Pathology and Forensic Dentistry, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Background:
The major application of forensic odontology includes the identification of human remains using antemortem and postmortem dental records where an individual is skeletonized, burnt, decomposed, or diminished and cannot be identified by regular methods. The present study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of forensic odontology in dental practitioners.
Methods:
This questionnaire-based cross-sectional descriptive study was done among dental practitioners working in different hospitals, medical colleges and dental clinics in Kathmandu, Nepal. A total of 171 general dental practitioners, specialists and faculty members were included in the study. The questionnaire included eight questions related to knowledge, four questions on attitude and four questions on practice. The data obtained was entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 21. For knowledge, attitude and practice scores, frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were calculated. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the knowledge, attitude and practice scores between general dentists and specialists.
Results:
The mean knowledge score was 6.70±0.73, the mean attitude score was 2.05±0.97and the mean practice score was 2.68±0.89. Of the total study participants, 170 (99.4%) had adequate knowledge,122(71.3%) had adequate attitude, and 153(89.5%) had adequate practice. There was no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge and practice scores between general dentists and specialists. The mean attitude score was found to be higher among general dentists than among specialists, which was statistically significant (p-value less than 0.05).
Conclusions:
The study highlights a gap between dentists' knowledge and their attitudes and practices regarding forensic odontology. While they are well-informed, there is a need to improve their practical engagement and record-keeping for effective forensic application in medicolegal cases.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
01:21Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
01:26Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.