Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Comparative Analysis of Flexural Strength and Surface Hardness of Denture Base Resins Fabricated via Conventional,
Aim:
This study evaluates and compares the mechanical properties flexural strength and surface hardness of denture base resins fabricated using conventional, CAD/CAM, and 3D printing techniques. Additionally, the effects of thermal cycling on these properties were investigated to simulate intraoral conditions.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 80 specimens were prepared and divided into four groups based on fabrication methods: conventional heat-polymerized acrylic resin, pre-polymerized CAD/CAM-milled PMMA, and photopolymerized 3D-printed resins using DLP and LCD technologies. Flexural strength was assessed via a three-point bending test, and surface hardness was measured before and after thermal cycling (5000 cycles between 5°C and 55°C). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test with a significance level of p<0.05.
Results:
CAD/CAM specimens exhibited the highest flexural strength, followed by DLPprinted resins, LCD-printed resins and conventional resins. Thermal cycling significantly reduced flexural strength across all groups, with 3D-printed resins being the most affected. Surface hardness improved in 3D-printed materials post-thermal cycling, while CAD/CAM and conventional resins showed stable values.
Conclusion:
CAD/CAM-produced denture base resins demonstrated superior mechanical properties, making them the most clinically viable option. While 3D-printed resins show promise in terms of adaptability and surface resilience, enhancements in material formulations and polymerization techniques are necessary to improve their mechanical strength.

