Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Photoselective Vaporesection of the Prostate via an End-firing Lithium Triborate Crystal Laser
Published on: May 9, 2018
Power is not performance: Analysis of laser-use metrics from a randomised clinical trial comparing low- and
Mathias S Æsøy1,2, Christian Beisland1,2, Øyvind Ulvik1,2
1Helse Bergen HF, Department of Urology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.
Objective:
Thulium fibre laser (TFL) offers a wide range of power settings during ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy, yet the impact of power selection on intraoperative laser-use dynamics remains unclear. The objective of this study was to characterise differences in laser activation patterns between low-power (LP) and high-power (HP) TFL during sheathless URS.
Materials And Methods:
This was a predefined secondary analysis of intraoperative laser data collected during a randomised clinical trial comparing LP (0.4-0.6 J × 10 Hz; 4-6 W) and HP (0.4-0.8 J × 20-40 Hz; 16-18 W) TFL URS lithotripsy. Flexible URS was performed without a ureteral access sheath. Laser system logs provided time-stamped activation and pause events with microsecond precision. Laser-use dynamics were characterised using a predefined set of complementary metrics, including active laser time (ALT), laser operating time (LOT), total activation count, activation durations, pause durations and operator duty cycle (ODC = ALT/LOT). Group comparisons used Holm-Bonferroni-adjusted p values.
Results:
Data from 72 LP and 74 HP procedures were analysed. ALT was longer with LP (23 vs. 13 min; p < 0.001), whereas LOT was similar (31 vs. 30 min; p = 0.194). LP had a lower activation count (55 vs. 89; p < 0.001) and longer activations (median 24 s vs. 7 s; p < 0.001). Empirical cumulative distribution function analysis showed 89.4% of LP activations lasted ≤30 s compared with 97.2% for HP (p < 0.001). Total pause time was shorter in LP (8 vs. 14 min; p < 0.001), resulting in a higher ODC (73% vs. 49%; p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
LP and HP TFL lithotripsy result in distinctly different laser-use dynamics during sheathless URS. LP supported sustained, continuous lasing, whereas HP yielded fragmented activation requiring frequent pauses. Coupled with superior stone-free outcomes in the parent trial, these findings suggest that preserving clear endoscopic visibility and more active lasing may be more impactful than increasing laser power.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

