Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Treatment Model for Young Patients with Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction and Resultant Infertility
Published on: May 30, 2025
Outcome measurement instruments for the core outcome sets on genital gender-affirming surgery: the GenderCOS project
Matteo Angelini1,2,3, Philippine J Roijer1,2, Marleen S Vallinga1,2
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC (Location VUmc) - Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background:
Outcome assessment in genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS) has long been a heterogenous practice. Although two core outcome sets (COS) for masculinizing and feminizing gGAS have been previously established, the absence of standardized and validated outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) limits consistent reporting. The second phase of the GenderCOS project aimed to identify, evaluate, and recommend OMIs to standardize outcome assessment and facilitate adoption of the COS in gGAS research, ultimately enabling comparability and evidence synthesis.
Methods:
The project followed the Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative standards and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for selecting OMIs for a COS. Phase 2 of the GenderCOS project was conducted from September 2024 to June 2025. Potential OMIs were identified through systematic reviews: PROSPERO: CRD42022347400 (inception to September 2023) and CRD42020223430 (inception to November 2020), clinical guidelines, and international expert consultations. All instruments relevant to at least one core outcome underwent quality and feasibility assessment. Consensus on the most appropriate OMIs and essential supplementary information was achieved through an international consensus process involving professional experts across multiple disciplines.
Findings:
A total of 380 potential OMIs were identified through systematic searches. After domain- and COS- matching, 152 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and 53 clinical OMIs were evaluated on quality and feasibility aspects. The consensus process among professional experts in gender-care, resulted in measurement recommendations for 19 of the 20 unique core outcomes. These recommendations endorse the use of validated PROMs for the included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and adherence to existing clinical guidelines for clinical outcomes and adverse events. For the remaining outcome relating to feminizing gGAS, a measurement recommendation was made for the subgroup that underwent vaginoplasty only. Development of an OMI suitable for all feminizing gGAS is also recommended.
Interpretation:
The GenderCOS provides the first consensus-based standardized measurement framework for core outcomes in gGAS. Its modular structure and inclusion of validated instruments enable harmonized reporting, data synthesis and evidence-based improvement in gGAS research.
Funding:
None received.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
External Female Genitals
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Nursing Evaluation
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra....

