Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
Paediatric Central Venous Access Devices: An Evidence and Gap Map of Global Research
Tricia M Kleidon1,2,3, Sabrina de Souza2, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha4
1Queensland Children's Hospital, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Insights
This study maps evidence on pediatric central venous access device (CVAD) interventions, revealing significant gaps in research. Future studies should focus on rigorous, diverse, and outcome-specific pediatric CVAD research.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric healthcare research
- Evidence synthesis and mapping
- Medical device interventions
Background:
- Central venous access devices (CVADs) are critical in pediatric care but carry substantial risks.
- There is a need to synthesize evidence for safe, effective, and equitable CVAD practice.
- Evolving interventions and complex management require updated evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To create an evidence and gap map (EGM) of pediatric research on interventions improving CVAD outcomes.
- To identify, categorize, and visualize existing evidence.
- To highlight areas needing further investigation.
Main Methods:
- Systematic searches conducted in major databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, CENTRAL) from 2014 to June 2024.
- Included randomized and non-randomized trials, implementation studies, and systematic reviews for patients aged 0-18 years.
- Data extraction by two independent reviewers, descriptive analysis, and visualization using Tableau.
Main Results:
- 151 pediatric-specific studies identified from 952 broader EGM studies.
- Most studies originated from high-income countries (72%), focusing on critical care (41.9%) and oncology (38.5%).
- Evidence primarily covers infection prevention and insertion technologies, with limited reporting on patient-reported or economic outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Significant evidence gaps exist for pediatric CVAD interventions.
- The majority of studies lacked control groups or detailed CVAD type information.
- Future research must prioritize rigorous, pediatric-specific studies across diverse settings and outcome measures.
Context:
Central venous access devices (CVADs) are essential in paediatric care but pose significant risks. Synthesising existing evidence is needed to guide safe, effective, and equitable practice amid evolving interventions and complex management needs.
Objective:
To develop an evidence and gap map (EGM) to identify, categorise, and visualise paediatric evidence on interventions aimed at improving CVAD outcomes.
Data Sources:
Following Campbell Collaboration guidance, systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and CENTRAL (date limits: 2014 to 30 June 2024).
Study Selection:
Eligible studies included patients (0-18 years) evaluating an intervention to improve CVAD outcomes, including randomised and non-randomised trials, implementation studies, and systematic reviews.
Data Extraction:
Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data on CVAD type, intervention, setting, outcomes, and study design. Data were descriptively analysed and visualised in Tableau.
Results:
Of 952 studies in the broader EGM, 151 were paediatric-specific. Most were conducted in high-income countries (72%) and high-acuity settings, including critical care (41.9%) and oncology (38.5%). CVAD type was unspecified in 80.1% of studies. Systematic reviews (22.5%) and randomised controlled trials (28.5%) were available, though 40.4% of studies were before-and-after studies without controls. Common interventions addressed infection prevention, insertion technologies, and flushing. Clinical outcomes, particularly bloodstream infection (27.8%), dominated reporting, while patient-reported, economic, and device removal outcomes were rarely reported (< 2%).
Limitations:
Only studies from the last 10 years and English-language databases were included. No formal quality appraisal was conducted.
Conclusions:
Significant evidence gaps exist. Future research should prioritise rigorous, paediatric-specific studies across diverse settings and outcome domains.
Trial Registration:
Open Science Framework (OSF) q6gcr: https://osf.io/q6gcr/overview.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

