Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Understanding Motivation to Participate in Clinical Trials: Insights to Diversify Clinical Research Using Health
Rifath Ara Alam Barsha1, Shervin Assari2,3,4,5, Samuel Byiringiro6
1John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Abstract:
Motivation plays a central role in driving individuals to participate in clinical trials, and understanding its multifaceted nature is essential for improving trial diversity. This study aimed to (1) identify the different dimensions of motivation for clinical trial participation, (2) examine the sociodemographic and health predictors of motivation, and (3) test whether the predictors differ by gender, race, and ethnicity. Data were drawn from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 4; n = 3865). Eight survey items assessing motivation were analyzed using factor analysis, leading to the creation of three latent domains (general, material, and care-related motivation) via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), which served as study outcomes. SEM was applied to estimate associations between predictors and each motivation domain, both in the pooled sample and across gender, race, and ethnic subgroups. In the pooled sample, higher educational attainment (beta = 0.118, p < 0.001) was positively associated, and Black (beta = -0.074, p < 0.05) and other races (beta = -0.122, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with the motivation general outcome. Age (beta = -0.365, p < 0.001) and income (beta = -0.081, p < 0.05) were negatively associated with the motivation material domain. Educational attainment (beta = 0.135, p < 0.001), income (beta = 0.092, p < 0.05), depressive and anxiety symptoms (beta = 0.090, p < 0.01), and cardiometabolic conditions (beta = 0.089, p < 0.01) showed positive associations with the motivation care outcome, while age was negatively associated (beta = -0.089, p < 0.05). Multi-group SEM showed significant gender-, race-, and ethnicity-specific differences. Motivational patterns differed by gender, race, and ethnicity, emphasizing that understanding these variations can strengthen recruitment, retention, and inclusivity in clinical trials.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Current Trends in Nursing II
Longitudinal Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Purpose of Health Records II