Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
Identifying High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma for Early Intervention
Cecilie V Maeng1,2,3, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson4,5, Christian Brieghel1,3
1Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
The 2/20/20 model more accurately identifies high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) patients for early treatment compared to AQUILA criteria. AQUILA criteria over-identifies patients, including those with lower progression risk.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a precursor to active multiple myeloma, and early treatment may benefit high-risk patients.
- Inconsistent definitions for high-risk SMM can lead to the inclusion of different disease subsets, complicating treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the AQUILA trial inclusion criteria and the 2/20/20 risk stratification model for identifying high-risk SMM.
- To assess the progression risk associated with each definition in distinct SMM cohorts.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study utilizing data from the population-based Iceland Screens, Treats, and Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM) study and the Danish Lymphoid Cancer Resource (DALY-CARE) clinical database.
- Retrospective analysis of progression risk based on initiation of treatment for individuals meeting high-risk criteria under both the AQUILA and 2/20/20 models.
Main Results:
- The AQUILA criteria identified a higher proportion of high-risk SMM (34% in iStopMM, 55% in DALY-CARE) compared to the 2/20/20 model (8% in iStopMM, 19% in DALY-CARE).
- Individuals classified as high-risk by the AQUILA criteria in the clinical cohort showed a 2-year progression risk of 27.0% (14.5% annual rate).
- In contrast, those defined as high-risk by the 2/20/20 model exhibited a higher 2-year progression risk of 44.1% (27.3% annual rate).
Conclusions:
- The 2/20/20 model more accurately identifies a high-risk SMM subgroup with a substantially higher progression risk compared to the AQUILA criteria.
- These findings suggest that the 2/20/20 model is more suitable for selecting patients with SMM who are most likely to benefit from early therapeutic intervention.
More Related Videos
07:53Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019