Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
Published on: June 29, 2019
How DISCERNing is ChatGPT? An Evaluation of Models and Prompt Engineering in Assessing Patient Education Materials
Justin Blackman1, Danica Friesen1, Markus Bernardus Sikkel1,2,3,4,5
1Island Medical Program, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Objectives:
The objective of this study is to evaluate whether ChatGPT models can reliably apply the DISCERN instrument, a 16-question human-scored rubric developed in 1999 to evaluate consumer health information, and assess the impact of prompting strategies, model choice, and scoring repeatability on agreement with human-derived DISCERN scores.
Methods:
A PubMed search of "DISCERN" identified English-language studies since 2019 reporting exact webpage URLs with corresponding human-derived DISCERN scores. Archived versions of 42 webpages were retrieved. Three ChatGPT models (GPT-5.2, GPT-4o, and o3) were evaluated using four prompting strategies: "Naïve" zero-shot, item-level "Split" scoring, "Augmented" prompting with DISCERN guidance, and a "Combined" split-plus-augmented approach. Agreement with human scores was assessed using correlations and absolute differences. Repeatability was examined using 10 repeated scoring runs across 9 webpages.
Results:
Agreement between ChatGPT-generated and human DISCERN scores was weak to moderate. All models demonstrated systematic score compression, overestimating low-quality webpages and underestimating high-quality webpages. Combined prompting modestly improved agreement and reduced absolute error, particularly for the o3 model, which consistently outperformed GPT-5.2 and GPT-4o. Substantial run-to-run variability was observed with a mean score range of 17.5 points and ranges up to 43 points for the same webpage. Averaging scores across runs did not improve agreement with human ratings. ChatGPT's DISCERN scoring reflects systematic attenuation consistent with prediction under noisy subjective measurement. Prompt engineering did not correct calibration bias or reproducibility limitations.
Conclusion:
Under the prompting strategies evaluated, ChatGPT models were insufficient for reliable automated DISCERN scoring. Persistent attenuation bias and poor repeatability significantly limit clinical or research applicability.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Nursing Evaluation