Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation via Colonoscopy for Recurrent C. difficile Infection
Published on: December 8, 2014
A Randomized Trial of Rifaximin vs Low Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, and Polyols Diet
Allen Lee1, Krishna Rao2, Prashant Singh1
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Background & Aims:
The low Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides, And Polyols (FODMAP) diet (LFD) and rifaximin are effective in <50% individuals with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), highlighting the need to identify predictors of treatment response. We therefore conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing LFD and rifaximin to identify microbial predictors of response.
Methods:
Sixty-five adults with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) were randomized to LFD or rifaximin for 5 weeks. Primary endpoints were changes in mean daily abdominal pain and bloating at week 5 vs baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in IBS Symptom Severity Score and Bristol Stool Form Scale at week 5 vs baseline. Exploratory endpoints included responders defined as ≥30% reduction in abdominal pain or bloating. Stool samples collected at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 5 underwent 16S rRNA sequencing, and glucose breath testing (BT) was performed at weeks 0 and 5.
Results:
Both LFD and rifaximin significantly improved abdominal pain (-0.29 with LFD vs -0.24 points/week with rifaximin); bloating (-0.29 vs -0.19 per week); and IBS Symptom Severity Score (-14.2 vs -13.3 per week) at week 5 (all P < .0001), with no significant change in Bristol Stool Form Scale. BT results were inconsistent predictors of response, with positive baseline hydrogen BT associated with lower odds of rifaximin response, and methane conversion at week 5 showed discordant associations with rifaximin response. In contrast, distinct baseline taxa were associated with treatment response. LFD responders had lower abundance of putative saccharolytic taxa (Butyricimonas, Bacteroides, Intestinibacter), whereas rifaximin responders were enriched in taxa with putative short-chain fatty acid-producing and bile acid-modifying potential (Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, Odoribacter). Nonresponders exhibited enrichment of putative proteolytic taxa (Bilophila, Alistipes, Prevotella).
Conclusions:
LFD and rifaximin are equally effective for IBS-D, with distinct microbial predictors of response. However, these findings require validation before informing personalized treatment approaches.
Clinicaltrials:
gov, Number: NCT03219528.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome

