Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informant scoring errors on the Adaptive Behavior Scale.

S Spreat

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency
    |January 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Validity and reliability of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behaviour Scale.

    Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2015
    Same author

    Improve quality in nursing homes or institute community placement? Implementation of OBRA for individuals with mental retardation.

    Research in developmental disabilities·1998
    Same author

    Extreme reduction of methylphenidate levels by carbamazepine.

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·1998
    Same author

    Use of psychotropic medications for persons with mental retardation who live in Oklahoma nursing homes.

    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)·1998
    Same author

    Use of psychotropic medication in Oklahoma: a statewide survey.

    American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·1997
    Same author

    Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale.

    American journal of mental retardation : AJMR·1996
    Same journal

    Requisites for the further development of family care of mental patients.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    Same journal

    The improvement of educational programs for the mentally deficient.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    Same journal

    Manual assignments for the mentally deficient.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    Same journal

    Identifying the slow-learning child.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    Same journal

    Study of feeble-minded wards employed in war industries.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    Same journal

    Mental defectives in military service and wartime industries.

    American journal of mental deficiency·2010
    See all related articles

    Scoring errors are common in the Adaptive Behavior Scale, with over two mistakes per booklet on average. This suggests the scale

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Behavioral Assessment

    Background:

    • The Adaptive Behavior Scale (ABS) is widely used for assessing adaptive functioning in individuals.
    • Accurate scoring is crucial for reliable interpretation of assessment results.
    • Previous research has not extensively detailed the types and prevalence of scoring errors in the ABS.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and quantify scoring errors in Adaptive Behavior Scale booklets.
    • To determine the most frequent types of scoring errors.
    • To investigate potential reasons for observed scoring errors, particularly underestimation.

    Main Methods:

    • Examination of 284 Adaptive Behavior Scale booklets completed by direct-care personnel.
    • Systematic review of each booklet for scoring inaccuracies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of the average number of errors per booklet.
  • Categorization of error types, focusing on addition and subtraction mistakes.
  • Main Results:

    • An average of over two scoring errors per booklet was identified.
    • The most common errors included simple addition mistakes and failure to perform directed subtractions.
    • Evidence suggests the ABS format may contribute to systematic underestimation of adaptive behaviors.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant scoring errors exist in the practical application of the Adaptive Behavior Scale.
    • The scale's design may inadvertently lead to underestimation, impacting assessment validity.
    • Recommendations for improving scoring accuracy and scale format were discussed.