Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Assessment of Respiratory Function in Conscious Mice by Double-chamber Plethysmography
Published on: July 10, 2018
Spectral Intra-Lot and Inter-Lot Variability in Methacholine
Uiyeol Yoon1,2, Ayumi Tarianto3, Philip J Almeter1,2
1Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY 40536.
None:
Methacholine chloride is a parasympathomimetic (cholinergic) bronchoconstrictor agent. It is administered exclusively in solution via inhalation for diagnostic purposes, strictly indicated for diagnosing bronchial airway hyperreactivity in adults and pediatric patients aged five years and older who lack clinically apparent asthma. Spectrometric evaluation of a single manufacturing batch, lot P3055R, revealed distinct anomalies, most notably a broad absorbance peak at 5131 cm- 1 that was present in certain vials but entirely absent in others. Principal component analysis orthogonally quantified this intralot variance, demonstrating that Vial 1 deviated by 7.3 standard deviations (SDs) from the cluster center, while a subsequent rotation identified Vial 4 as an outlier positioned 4.3 SDs away. Expanding the evaluation to a 39-vial library across three distinct lots (P3055R, P3048R, and P4009S) demonstrated significant interlot structural variance. This complexity required nine full principal components to model 99.97% of the cumulative variation. Furthermore, the application of the nonparametric FSOB (Fast Son of BEST) subcluster analysis algorithm inside the spectral clusters confirmed the geometric separation of the data into statistically significant sub-groups. Specifically, vials 8 through 18 naturally separated from the remaining library (vials 1 through 7 and 19 through 39). This geometric separation spanned an extensive correlation distance of 58.8 SDs, defined by the statistical metrics rtn=0.9944, rts=0.8903, and σ=0.0019, with probability-density perturbations achieving a significance level of p=0.02. While these quantified deviations do not definitively prove the presence of adulteration or an excess level of impurities, they strongly indicate that the manufacturer's production pipeline may have drifted outside of a state of strict process control, warranting further investigation.

