Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Diagnostic Strategies and Biomarker Development for Comprehensive Lung Function Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Photon-counting CT vs V/Q SPECT for lobar perfusion quantification in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
Matthias M V Moeskes1, Thorsten Derlin2,3, Anna M Hunkemöller4
1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. moeskes.matthias@mh-hannover.de.
Background:
Ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT) is the standard first-line imaging method for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but it lacks anatomical detail. Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) enables high-resolution assessment of perfusion, vasculature, and parenchyma in one scan, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy.
Objectives:
To compare quantitative lobar lung perfusion between PCCT and V/Q-SPECT in patients with suspected or confirmed CTEPH.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective single-centre study included twenty-three patients (ten females, thirteen males; mean age 67.9 ± 10.7 years). The median interval between PCCT and V/Q-SPECT imaging was 3 days (range: 0-11 days). Lung perfusion was analysed on a lobar basis using PCCT-derived perfused blood volume (PBV) maps and V/Q-SPECT perfusion images. Data were normalised using a z-score approach based on the 95% confidence interval. Lobar segmentation was performed with TotalSegmentator. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses compared lobar and whole-lung perfusion metrics. Perfusion defect volumes were quantified from normalised maps.
Results:
Whole-lung perfusion correlated strongly between PCCT and V/Q-SPECT (r = 0.72, p < 0.05). Lobar correlations ranged from r = 0.62 to r = 0.85. PCCT yielded slightly higher perfusion values (mean PBV 0.50 ± 0.04) than V/Q-SPECT (0.49 ± 0.09). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of +0.015 (limits -0.13 to +0.16). Perfusion defect volumes correlated moderately (whole-lung r = 0.60, lobes r = 0.49-0.77, p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
PCCT-based perfusion imaging shows high concordance with V/Q-SPECT in this cohort, supporting its feasibility as a single-modality tool for functional and anatomical lung evaluation in CTEPH.
Key Points:
Question PCCT perfusion may address the unmet need for a combined functional and anatomical evaluation of CTEPH in a single examination. Findings PCCT showed strong correlation with V/Q-SPECT for lobar and whole-lung perfusion, with minimal bias and consistent quantitative agreement. Clinical relevance PCCT enables simultaneous high-resolution assessment of perfusion, vasculature, and parenchyma, potentially improving diagnostic confidence and streamlining CTEPH work-up in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
12:29Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Perfusion using Calibrated Arterial Spin Labeling
Published on: May 30, 2011
08:26Quantitative Mapping of Specific Ventilation in the Human Lung using Proton Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Oxygen as a Contrast Agent
Published on: June 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:29Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...