Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Motor and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients
Published on: September 1, 2023
Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in
Cecilia Meza1,2, Roberto S Hernandez3, Silvana L Costa4,5
1Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cognitive rehabilitation gains in multiple sclerosis (MS) depend on specific training modules and individual patient factors. Tailoring RehaCom training to each person
Area of Science:
- Neurorehabilitation
- Cognitive Science
- Clinical Neurology
Background:
- Computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs like RehaCom are used for multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Previous research focused on treatment duration and adherence, not specific modules or predictors of response.
- This study examines module progression and participant characteristics influencing cognitive improvement in progressive MS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between progression in specific RehaCom modules and processing speed improvement in people with MS.
- To identify baseline participant characteristics that predict responsiveness to cognitive rehabilitation.
- To support a precision approach in cognitive rehabilitation for progressive MS.
Main Methods:
- A secondary analysis of the CogEx trial involving 153 participants with progressive MS.
- 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules.
- Cognitive function assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months.
Main Results:
- Progression in 4 RehaCom modules significantly correlated with SDMT improvement, particularly Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2.
- Higher baseline SDMT, premorbid IQ, older age, and greater module progression predicted better 12-week SDMT performance.
- At 6 months, baseline SDMT, specific module progression, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance.
Conclusions:
- Processing speed improvements in progressive MS are linked to both specific training module progress and individual participant characteristics.
- Findings support tailoring cognitive rehabilitation content to individual cognitive profiles for enhanced outcomes.
- This research emphasizes a precision medicine approach for cognitive rehabilitation in MS.
More Related Videos
07:35Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity