Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Motor and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients
Published on: September 1, 2023
Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in
Cecilia Meza1,2, Roberto S Hernandez3, Silvana L Costa4,5
1Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract:
BackgroundRehaCom, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation program for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), has been studied primarily in relation to treatment "dose" (duration, frequency, and adherence), with less focus on which training modules drive improvement or which participant factors predict responsiveness. This secondary analysis of the CogEx trial investigated whether progression within specific RehaCom modules was associated with processing speed improvement, measured by the SDMT, and whether baseline characteristics predicted response in participants with progressive MS.MethodsA total of 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules. Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated associations between module progression and cognitive outcomes.ResultsProgression correlated significantly with SDMT improvement in 4 modules, with the strongest effects for Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P < .001) and Divided Attention-2 (r = .36, P < .001). Higher baseline SDMT, higher premorbid IQ, older age, and greater module progression independently predicted better SDMT performance at12-weeks (adjusted R2 = .73). At 6 months, higher baseline SDMT, greater progression in Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance (adjusted R2 = .71).ConclusionProcessing speed gains in progressive MS were related to both module-specific progression and participant characteristics, supporting a precision approach to cognitive rehabilitation that tailors training content to individual cognitive profiles. This study is a secondary analysis of the CogEx trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03679468; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679468).
More Related Videos
07:35Author Spotlight: Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients With a Digital Occupational Training System
Published on: December 29, 2023
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity