Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

5.8K
Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-cell profiling of BAL in preschool cystic fibrosis reveals macrophage dysregulation and ivacaftor-modified inflammatory programs in the early life lung.

Mucosal immunology·2026
Same author

Patient-derived organoids and neurospheres recapitulate salient features of primary tumor heterogeneity.

Neuro-oncology advances·2026
Same author

Antigen reactivity defines tissue-resident memory and exhausted T cells in tumors.

Nature immunology·2025
Same author

Dividing out quantification uncertainty enables assessment of differential transcript usage with limma and edgeR.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Parity and lactation induce T-cell-mediated breast cancer protection.

Nature·2025
Same author

The current landscape and emerging challenges of benchmarking single-cell methods.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same journal

Correction to 'New origin firing is inhibited by APC/CCdh1 activation in S-phase after severe replication stress'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

VeloRM: disentangling pre- and post-splicing RNA modification dynamics at single-cell resolution.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Accessibility of telomeric overhangs to stabilizing small-molecule ligands.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multivalent interactions mediate SNAIL transcription factor stimulation of the nucleosome deacetylase activity of the CoREST complex.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide mapping of DNA G-quadruplexes in Trypanosoma brucei chromatin reveals enrichment in coding regions and transcription start sites.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Multiplexed Single Cell mRNA Sequencing Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Cells
08:30

Multiplexed Single Cell mRNA Sequencing Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Cells

Published on: January 7, 2020

12.7K

CMDdemux: an efficient single cell demultiplexing method.

Jianan Wang1,2, Lizhong Chen3,4, Daniel V Brown5,4

  • 1Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, 3000 Victoria, Australia.

Nucleic Acids Research
|April 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

CMDdemux accurately demultiplexes cells from pooled sequencing experiments, even with low-quality hashtag data. This new method improves cell identification and data quality where others fail.

More Related Videos

An Ultrahigh-throughput Microfluidic Platform for Single-cell Genome Sequencing
10:00

An Ultrahigh-throughput Microfluidic Platform for Single-cell Genome Sequencing

Published on: May 23, 2018

18.8K
A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Multiplexed Single Cell mRNA Sequencing Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Cells
08:30

Multiplexed Single Cell mRNA Sequencing Analysis of Mouse Embryonic Cells

Published on: January 7, 2020

12.7K
An Ultrahigh-throughput Microfluidic Platform for Single-cell Genome Sequencing
10:00

An Ultrahigh-throughput Microfluidic Platform for Single-cell Genome Sequencing

Published on: May 23, 2018

18.8K
A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Single-cell genomics
  • Computational biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Multiplexing technologies, like hashtag-based labeling, enable high-throughput single-cell sequencing by pooling cells from different donors.
  • While beneficial, limitations in hashtag labeling can lead to low-quality data, challenging existing demultiplexing methods.
  • Current demultiplexing tools struggle with low-quality datasets, hindering accurate cell identity assignment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust demultiplexing method, CMDdemux, capable of handling low-quality multiplexing data.
  • To improve the accuracy of distinguishing singlets, doublets, and negatives in pooled single-cell sequencing.
  • To provide visualization tools for inspecting potentially misclassified droplets.

Main Methods:

  • CMDdemux integrates hashtag and messenger RNA data for demultiplexing.
  • Key steps include within-cell centered log-ratio (CLR) normalization, K-medoids clustering, and Mahalanobis distance-based classification.
  • The method incorporates visualization tools for user inspection of droplet classifications.

Main Results:

  • CMDdemux demonstrates high accuracy in distinguishing singlets, doublets, and negatives.
  • Benchmarking shows CMDdemux consistently outperforms existing methods on both high- and low-quality datasets.
  • The method exhibits robust performance on diverse low-quality multiplexing data, even where other methods fail.

Conclusions:

  • CMDdemux offers a significant advancement in demultiplexing low-quality single-cell sequencing data.
  • The method's robustness makes it effective across various multiplexing technologies and data qualities.
  • CMDdemux enhances the reliability and throughput of pooled single-cell experiments.