Safety and performance of a novel ICD lead for left bundle branch area pacing: Results from the ASCEND CSP trial
Robert D Schaller1, Prashanthan Sanders2, Jacqueline Joza3
1Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania.
Background:
Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has relied on adaptation of conventional leads not designed for conduction system pacing (CSP).
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a purpose-built CSP ICD lead designed for implantation within the LBBA.
Methods:
The ASCEND CSP Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) trial is a prospective, multicenter, global, single arm, pivotal trial evaluating the UltiSynq CSP ICD lead (Model LDA1122Q) in patients undergoing de novo ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. The primary safety end point was freedom from lead-related serious adverse device effects through 3 months, compared with a pre-specified performance goal of 88%. The primary effectiveness end point was the 3-month composite success rate of acceptable pacing capture threshold and R-wave sensing amplitude, with a performance goal of 80%. Defibrillation testing success was assessed in a pre-specified cohort.
Results:
Among 205 implant attempts, 202 patients (98.5%), had successful lead implantation, with LBBAP criteria met in 99.0%. Among these, LBBP or likely LBBP capture criteria were met in 86.0%. The 3-month major complication-free rate was 97.5% and the primary effectiveness end point was achieved in 94.6%, exceeding both safety and effectiveness performance goals. Defibrillation testing was successful in 100%, with 92.5% defibrillated with a single 20 J shock. Lead electrical performance remained stable through 3 months.
Conclusion:
In this pivotal IDE trial, a dedicated bipolar CSP ICD lead demonstrated high implant success, stable electrical performance, reliable defibrillation efficacy, and favorable short-term safety. Longer-term follow-up is warranted to confirm durability and sustained clinical benefit.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization


