Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

7.5K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
7.5K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI01:21

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

529
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, or CMRI, is a non-invasive diagnostic test that employs a magnetic field and radiofrequency waves to create precise images of the heart and arteries. It provides comprehensive information about cardiac anatomy, function, perfusion, and tissue characterization without ionizing radiation.IndicationsCMRI diagnoses various heart conditions, including tissue damage from heart attacks, ischemic heart disease, myocarditis, aortic issues (tears, aneurysms,...
529

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dysfunctional large-scale networks linking PTSD and cognitive impairment.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

Remimazolam versus Midazolam for Moderate Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2026
Same author

GLP-1 receptor agonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A propensity score-matched real-world analysis.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

The Perfusion Collateral Impairment Score Provides Complementary Prognostic Information Beyond CTA Collateral Scores and Standard Imaging Predictors in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Ischemic Lesion Net Water Uptake Outperforms ASPECTS and CBF Less Than 30% in Predicting Futile Recanalization after Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Financial Toxicity of Shorter Versus Longer Partial Breast Irradiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases
09:55

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K

Defacing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Algorithms: A Review on Privacy and Data Integrity.

Arsalan Nadeem1, Umar Akram1, Talha Iqbal1

  • 1From the Allama Iqbal Medical College (A.N., U.A.), Lahore, Pakistan; Khyber Medical College (T.I.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Mount Hebron High School (A.M.), MD, US and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (S.R., J.M., C.J., L.L., V.S. Y.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, US.

AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology
|April 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neuroimaging MRI defacing algorithms protect participant privacy but impact brain measurements. Choosing the right algorithm balances re-identification prevention with data utility for diverse research needs.

More Related Videos

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
05:14

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra

Published on: September 8, 2021

4.1K
Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases
09:55

Author Spotlight: Using Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI to Study Lung Diseases

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.9K
Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra
05:14

Standardized Data Acquisition for Neuromelanin-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Substantia Nigra

Published on: September 8, 2021

4.1K
Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
08:19

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences

Published on: May 17, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Medical Informatics
  • Data Privacy

Background:

  • Sharing neuroimaging datasets raises privacy concerns due to facial features in MRI scans.
  • MRI defacing algorithms obscure faces to prevent re-identification while preserving brain data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and evaluate major MRI defacing algorithms.
  • To assess algorithm performance in re-identification prevention, brain measurement preservation, and age group compatibility.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of MRI defacing algorithms (fsl_deface, mri_reface, afni_refacer, pydeface, SPM, FreeSurfer, AnonyMI).
  • Evaluation across diverse datasets, considering re-identification rates, volumetric measurement impact, and processing success.
  • Assessment of age-dependency and performance in clinical populations.

Main Results:

  • fsl_deface and mri_reface show lowest re-identification rates; afni_refacer and pydeface have highest processing success.
  • All algorithms affect brain volumetric measurements; some disrupt automated segmentation.
  • Performance varies significantly with age (pediatric/elderly) and clinical conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Optimal defacing algorithm selection is context-dependent, balancing privacy and data utility.
  • mri_reface and SPM are preferred for preserving brain measurements.
  • FreeSurfer is suitable for pediatric studies; AnonyMI excels in EEG/MEG co-registration.