Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
Lower facial third projection: Analysis using true vertical lines from subnasale and soft Nasion
Juan C Silva-Montero1, Juan C Rodríguez-Fernández2, Francisco Pastor-Dorado2
1Orthodontics at the University of Seville, Spain.
This study identified ideal facial measurements for orthognathic surgery. Optimal positioning of the upper incisor and soft pogonion significantly enhances facial aesthetics and surgical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry and Oral Surgery
- Facial Aesthetics
- Orthodontics
Background:
- Orthognathic surgery corrects malocclusions and improves facial aesthetics.
- Determining optimal facial structure positioning is crucial but debated.
- Aesthetic perception is subjective and influenced by specific anatomical landmarks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish numerical references for surgical planning in orthognathic surgery.
- To determine the ideal sagittal projection of maxillary incisors for aesthetic outcomes.
- To correlate specific cephalometric parameters with aesthetic perception in Caucasian patients.
Main Methods:
- Observational, retrospective study of 89 patients' lateral cephalometric and photographic records.
- Aesthetic evaluation using a 10-point scale by orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople.
- Measurement of cephalometric parameters, including upper incisor and soft pogonion positions, relative to the Barcelona Line and true vertical lines.
Main Results:
- Upper incisor and soft pogonion positions significantly impact aesthetic perception.
- The ideal upper incisor projection is 2.38 mm anterior to the Barcelona Line.
- The ideal soft pogonion projection is 6.02 mm anterior to the Barcelona Line.
Conclusions:
- Upper incisor and soft pogonion positions are key predictors of aesthetic outcomes in orthognathic surgery.
- Established numerical references can enhance surgical planning for improved facial aesthetics.
- While these findings are significant, other factors can also influence overall facial aesthetics.
More Related Videos
06:26Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
Muscles for Facial Expressions
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Nose and Nasal Cavity