Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

A Tripeptide-Stabilized Nanoemulsion of Oleic Acid
Published on: February 27, 2019
Comparative study of synthetic nanofilaments assembled from amphiphilic peptides and β-peptides as antigen delivery
Laetitia Mwadi Tshibwabwa1, Phuong Trang Nguyen1, Steve Bourgault1
1Department of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P.8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, H3C 3P8, Canada; Quebec Network for Research on Protein Function, Engineering and Applications (PROTEO), Montreal, Canada.
Abstract:
Synthetic peptide vaccines have a high safety profile, although their low immunogenicity requires the use of potent adjuvants and delivery systems. Self-assembling β-peptides and amphiphilic peptides have been identified as versatile building blocks for the preparation of immunostimulating nanocarriers instead of whole protein carrier to display epitopes. However, a direct comparison of the intrinsic immunogenicity of cross-β-sheet nanofilaments and peptide-amphiphile nanofibrils has never been performed. In this study, the amphiphilic peptide C16-V3A3K3 (PA) and the 10-mer self-assembling β-peptide I10 were respectively conjugated with two MHC-peptide epitope models, OVA253-266 and OVA323-339, able to polarize the adaptive immune response differently. Synthetic chimeric peptides self-assembled into cytocompatible nanofilaments that induced a robust antigen-specific IgG antibody response in mice, without the need of any additional adjuvants. The profile of IgG subtypes and the cellular immune response offered preliminary indications that PA induced a balanced Th1/Th2 immune response, whereas I10 exhibited a Th1-polarized pro-inflammatory response.
More Related Videos
07:26Formation of Ordered Biomolecular Structures by the Self-assembly of Short Peptides
Published on: November 21, 2013
07:33Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: September 28, 2022