Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Wireless Telemetry Device Implantation in a Fontan Ovine Model for Continuous and Long-Term Hemodynamic Monitoring
Published on: May 2, 2025
A Wireless Photoplethysmography Chest Patch for Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring: A Clinical Validation Study in
Louis Van Slambrouck1,2,3, Lucy Van Kleunen1,2, Charlotte Van den Storme3
1KU Leuven - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Kortrijk, Belgium.
This study found variable agreement between a wearable biosensor and standard monitors for vital signs in intensive care patients. Further optimization is needed before widespread clinical use of this wearable technology.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Critical Care Medicine
- Wearable Technology
Background:
- Continuous vital sign monitoring with wearable biosensors can improve patient safety by enabling earlier detection of clinical deterioration.
- This study focused on a wireless photoplethysmography-based chest patch biosensor designed to measure five vital signs for Early Warning Score calculation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate an integrated wireless photoplethysmography-based chest patch biosensor against standard continuous bedside monitoring in an intensive care unit setting.
- To assess the agreement of vital sign measurements between the wearable biosensor and a reference monitor.
Main Methods:
- Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement, calculating bias and limits of agreement for repeated measurements.
- Deming regression, Pearson correlation, and Clarke Error Grid analyses were performed to evaluate measurement differences.
- Data were aligned at 5- and 15-minute intervals using median reference values.
Main Results:
- Heart rate showed a bias of 0.16 bpm with limits of agreement from -17.06 to 17.38.
- Respiratory rate exhibited a bias of 3.77 breaths/min with limits of agreement from -6.78 to 14.31, with over 60% exceeding the 10% threshold.
- Systolic blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and temperature showed biases of -4.69 mmHg, -1.34%, and -0.29°C, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Overall agreement between the wearable chest-patch biosensor and standard bedside monitoring in intensive care patients was variable.
- A substantial proportion of measurements fell outside predefined accuracy thresholds, indicating a need for further optimization.
- Broader clinical application of the wearable biosensor requires further validation and improvement in device performance.
More Related Videos
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
04:24A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Pulse Assessment Sites
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.