Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

07:30
Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
Published on: July 19, 2021
4.0K
Rising Trends and Safety of Outpatient Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity-Matched National Analysis
Sri Saran Manivasagam1, Blake R Baer1, Jay D Raman1
1Department of Urology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Cureus
|April 27, 2026
Summary
Outpatient robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is increasingly safe and feasible for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Appropriately selected patients undergoing outpatient RPN show lower complication rates than inpatients, supporting expanded use.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN), including laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), is standard for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- The expansion of outpatient surgery raises questions about its safety and feasibility for oncologic procedures like RPN.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and trends of outpatient minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN), particularly robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN).
- To compare postoperative outcomes and identify predictors of adverse events in inpatient versus outpatient RPN.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data (2022-2023) for 8,927 adult RPN patients.
- Observation of outpatient MIPN trends (2019-2023) and propensity score matching to compare inpatient and outpatient RPN outcomes.
- Multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of 30-day infectious complications, reoperations, and readmissions.
Main Results:
- Outpatient MIPN utilization increased from 20.8% in 2019 to 35.5% in 2023.
- After matching, outpatient RPN (3,185 cases) showed significantly lower rates of pneumonia, PE, MI, DVT, septic shock, transfusions, reoperation, and readmissions compared to inpatient RPN (3,180 cases).
- Inpatient setting was an independent predictor for infectious complications (OR: 1.31), reoperation (OR: 1.92), and readmission (OR: 1.23).
Conclusions:
- Outpatient MIPN is increasingly adopted, with RPN demonstrating comparable safety to inpatient procedures in selected patients.
- Findings support the safe expansion of outpatient RPN, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and equitable access.
- Further research on long-term outcomes and individualized risk stratification is warranted.

