Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025
Gut Microbiota and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art, Clinical Signals, and Translational Opportunities
Maria Eugenia Alvaro1, Santino Caserta1, Enrica Antonia Martino1
1Hematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera of Cosenza, 87100 Cosenza, Italy.
Abstract:
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly morbid malignancy in which outcomes are constrained not only by disease refractoriness and relapse, but also by therapy-related toxicity-particularly infections, mucosal injury, and delayed hematopoietic reconstitution. The gut microbiota has emerged as a potentially modifiable layer of host vulnerability and resilience during AML treatment. Microbiome disruption is detectable already at diagnosis, even in antibiotic-naïve patients, and is often characterized by reduced community diversity, depletion of anaerobic taxa linked to short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, and enrichment of pathobiont-associated profiles. During induction, cytotoxic therapy and antimicrobials precipitates diversity loss, domination events, and persistent shifts beyond discharge. Clinically, the most consistent translational signal is the association between baseline or early-treatment microbiome features and infectious outcomes, while emerging data suggest that diagnosis-time microbiome structure may also relate to hematologic recovery kinetics. Mechanistic models converge on pathways linking barrier integrity, microbial metabolites (notably butyrate and other SCFAs), immune calibration, and inflammatory translocation of microbial products. These insights support hypotheses: antimicrobial stewardship may preserve microbiome function; ecosystem repair strategies such as autologous fecal microbiota transfer (A-FMT) are feasible and can restore community structure; and metabolite or nutritional interventions merit evaluation in immunocompromised hosts. Regimen-specific microbiome effects and microbiome-drug interactions suggest that treatment choice could have downstream microbiome-mediated consequences. We synthesize evidence, outline interventional concepts, and define methodological priorities for next-generation trials assessing causality and clinical benefit. Progress will require longitudinal sampling, multi-omic integration (metabolomics, resistomics, and barrier/inflammatory biomarkers), and interventional designs linking microbiome dynamics to clinically meaningful outcomes.
Insights
The gut microbiome significantly impacts acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment outcomes and toxicity. Strategies like microbiome repair and antimicrobial stewardship show promise for improving patient resilience and recovery.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Microbiology
- Immunology
Background:
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is limited by toxicity and relapse.
- The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in host resilience and vulnerability during AML therapy.
- Microbiome disruption, characterized by reduced diversity and altered microbial composition, is evident even before treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize current evidence on the gut microbiome's role in AML treatment.
- To explore potential interventional strategies targeting the microbiome.
- To define priorities for future research and clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing research on AML and the gut microbiome.
- Analysis of microbiome alterations during cytotoxic therapy and antimicrobial use.
- Exploration of mechanistic links between microbiome, host immunity, and treatment outcomes.
Main Results:
- Microbiome disruption is common at AML diagnosis and worsens with therapy.
- Baseline and early-treatment microbiome features correlate with infectious complications and potentially hematologic recovery.
- Gut microbial metabolites, like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), influence host pathways.
Conclusions:
- Antimicrobial stewardship and microbiome restoration strategies (e.g., A-FMT) are promising.
- Metabolite and nutritional interventions warrant investigation in immunocompromised patients.
- Future trials require longitudinal multi-omic data and interventional designs to establish causality.

