Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Monitoring PD-1-Blocking Antibodies Bound to T Cells Derived from a Drop of Peripheral Blood
Published on: February 5, 2020
Re-Exposure of a PD-1 Inhibitor After Previous Immune-Related Adverse Events
Jana Burghaus-Zhang1, Carsten Schulz1, Egle Ramelyte2
1Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Background:
Programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors are well established in the treatment of dermatological tumors. Mostly, they are well tolerated, but in about 9-21% of patients, grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur. As treatment options are limited, it is of interest to determine whether readministration of another or the same PD-(L)1 inhibitor is safe.
Methods:
This is a multicenter, retrospective study on patients with metastasized dermatological tumors who were retreated with either the same or a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor after the development of irAEs. The study was conducted at centers in Heidelberg, Zurich, and Frankfurt.
Results:
22 patients were included between April 2020 and December 2022 with a median age of 71 years. A total of 13 (59%) patients were re-exposed with the same antibody and nine (41%) received a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Six (46%) of the patients who were re-exposed to the same antibody had an irAE, of which 67% were identical with the first. In patients receiving a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor, four (44%) developed an irAE, of which 75% were identical with the first.
Conclusions:
Both an intraclass switch of PD-(L)1 inhibitor treatment and re-exposure with the same antibody after an irAE can be considered as options with a fair chance of improving therapy tolerance.
Insights
Retreating patients with dermatological tumors using the same or different Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors after immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can be safe. This approach offers a viable option for improving therapy tolerance in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Dermatology
Background:
- Programmed cell death protein (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors are standard treatments for skin cancers.
- While generally safe, 9-21% of patients experience severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs).
- Limited alternative treatments necessitate evaluating the safety of re-administering PD-(L)1 inhibitors post-irAEs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of re-challenging patients with PD-(L)1 inhibitors after irAEs.
- To compare outcomes between re-exposure to the same PD-(L)1 inhibitor versus switching to a different one.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, retrospective study involving patients with metastatic dermatological tumors.
- Patients received either the same or a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor following prior irAEs.
- Data collected from centers in Heidelberg, Zurich, and Frankfurt.
Main Results:
- 22 patients (median age 71) were analyzed.
- 13 patients (59%) were re-exposed to the same PD-(L)1 inhibitor; 6 (46%) developed irAEs (67% identical to prior).
- 9 patients (41%) received a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor; 4 (44%) developed irAEs (75% identical to prior).
Conclusions:
- Re-exposure to the same PD-(L)1 inhibitor after irAEs is a safe option.
- Switching to a different PD-(L)1 inhibitor is also a viable strategy post-irAEs.
- Both strategies offer a reasonable chance of improved therapeutic tolerance.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Allergic Drug Reactions

