Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
What Lies Behind Diagnostic Labels? High Intra-Individual Variability Is the True Cognitive Signature of University
Sara Zonca1, Marzia Lucia Bizzaro2, Luisa Girelli2
1Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Adults with Specific Learning Disorders show significant cognitive variability, especially in working memory. A profile-based approach is recommended over traditional labels for better support.
Area of Science:
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Cognitive Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Specific Learning Disorders (SLDs) are lifelong neurodevelopmental conditions often researched in children, but persisting into adulthood with heterogeneous cognitive profiles.
- Adult SLD research lacks consensus on operationalizing diagnoses and understanding cognitive variability.
- This study addresses cognitive heterogeneity in university students with SLDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map cognitive functioning variability in university students diagnosed with Specific Learning Disorders.
- To investigate differences in cognitive profiles across diagnostic categories and comorbidities.
- To explore the utility of traditional diagnostic labels versus cognitive profiles in adults with SLDs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 166 university students with SLDs.
- Categorization into subgroups: predominant reading disorder, arithmetic disorder, and mixed learning disorder.
- Cognitive assessment using Wechsler scales indices, analyzed with linear mixed-effects models and Latent Profile Analysis.
Main Results:
- Reasoning abilities were higher than cognitive efficiency; working memory was a consistent weakness across all participants.
- The mixed-disorder group showed the lowest cognitive scores and most pronounced working memory deficits.
- Latent Profile Analysis revealed two subgroups: 'Low Profile' (weaker working memory) and 'High Profile' (stronger reasoning). Diagnostic labels showed limited alignment with these profiles, indicating significant intra-individual variability.
Conclusions:
- Traditional categorical labels for SLDs have limited explanatory power in adults due to high cognitive heterogeneity.
- Persistent cognitive weaknesses, particularly in working memory, are evident even in high-achieving university students.
- Clinical and educational support for adults with SLDs should adopt a dimensional, profile-based model over a label-based approach.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Language and Cognition
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Reliability and Validity
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

