How to Change the Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic
Martina Canichella1, Paolo de Fabritiis1,2
1Hematology, St. Eugenio Hospital, ASL Roma2, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has long constituted a cornerstone of post-remission consolidation therapy for adults with high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), offering potent graft-versus-leukemia activity at the expense of significant treatment-related toxicity (TRT) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Over the past two decades, however, outcomes following allo-HSCT have improved substantially. This progress has been driven primarily by a marked reduction in NRM, translating into improved overall survival (OS), as consistently documented by large cooperative group analyses and single-center series. Advances in supportive care, infectious prophylaxis, donor selection, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention have contributed substantially to this improvement. In parallel, transplant decision-making has been profoundly reshaped by refined disease biology-based risk stratification and the systematic evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD). Moreover, the advent of highly effective immunotherapeutic approaches-including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies-has enabled the achievement of deeper molecular remissions prior to transplantation, both in first and subsequent complete remissions. Taken together, these developments have shifted allo-HSCT from a widely applied strategy to a more individualized, risk-adapted therapeutic approach. This review examines how the indications, timing, and objectives of allo-HSCT are evolving in the contemporary treatment landscape of adult B-ALL, with particular emphasis on Philadelphia chromosome-negative, Philadelphia-like, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease subsets.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has long constituted a cornerstone of post-remission consolidation therapy for adults with high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), offering potent graft-versus-leukemia activity at the expense of significant treatment-related toxicity (TRT) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Over the past two decades, however, outcomes following allo-HSCT have improved substantially. This progress has been driven primarily by a marked reduction in NRM, translating into improved overall survival (OS), as consistently documented by large cooperative group analyses and single-center series. Advances in supportive care, infectious prophylaxis, donor selection, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention have contributed substantially to this improvement. In parallel, transplant decision-making has been profoundly reshaped by refined disease biology-based risk stratification and the systematic evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD). Moreover, the advent of highly effective immunotherapeutic approaches-including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies-has enabled the achievement of deeper molecular remissions prior to transplantation, both in first and subsequent complete remissions. Taken together, these developments have shifted allo-HSCT from a widely applied strategy to a more individualized, risk-adapted therapeutic approach. This review examines how the indications, timing, and objectives of allo-HSCT are evolving in the contemporary treatment landscape of adult B-ALL, with particular emphasis on Philadelphia chromosome-negative, Philadelphia-like, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease subsets.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Stem Cell Therapy for Tissue Regeneration
Types of Stem Cells used in Stem Cell Therapy
The two main cell...


