Early Versus Delayed Plate Fixation in Pilon Fractures-Which Is More Advantageous?

İsmail Güzel1, İbrahim Ulusoy2, Mehmet Yılmaz3

  • 1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine Malatya Turgut Özal University, 44210 Malatya, Turkey.

Insights

Early surgical fixation of pilon fractures speeds healing and improves function, but carries higher soft tissue risks. Delayed surgery is safer for soft tissues but may prolong recovery.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Trauma Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Pilon fractures involve distal tibia fractures from high-energy trauma.
  • Surgical timing (early vs. delayed) impacts pilon fracture outcomes.
  • Plate fixation is a common surgical treatment method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare early versus delayed plate fixation for pilon fractures.
  • To evaluate effects on healing time, functional outcomes, and complications.
  • To assess single versus double plate fixation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 80 pilon fracture patients (2018-2023).
  • Groups: Early surgery (<72h, n=40) vs. Delayed surgery (>7d, n=40).
  • Fixation types: Single plate (n=40) vs. Double plate (n=40).

Main Results:

  • Early surgery group showed significantly shorter healing time (14.2 vs. 16.8 weeks).
  • Early surgery yielded better functional outcomes (AOFAS score: 82.3 vs. 78.1).
  • Delayed surgery had lower infection rates (7.5% vs. 12.5%).

Conclusions:

  • Early fixation accelerates pilon fracture healing and functional recovery.
  • Delayed fixation reduces infection risk but may extend recovery time.
  • Plate fixation choice impacts stability and soft tissue complications; personalized approach advised.