Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Tocilizumab and Rituximab in Systemic Sclerosis: A Real-Life Retrospective Observational Study Across Different
Silvia Cavalli1,2, Maria Rosa Pellico1,2, Giorgia Trignani1,2
1Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Abstract:
Objectives: To describe the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) and rituximab (RTX) in real-world patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), across different clinical phenotypes and lines of therapy, evaluating both global clinical outcomes and lung function. Methods: SSc patients treated with TCZ (n = 27) or RTX (n = 23) were retrospectively followed for 12-24 months. Clinical measures, including modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), C-reactive protein (CRP), and revised EUSTAR activity index 2017 (RAI), as well as spirometric parameters, were recorded at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months. Statistical methods for repeated measures were applied to investigate outcome trends. Given the baseline differences, between-group comparisons were considered exploratory. Results: RTX was used earlier in disease course, while TCZ was mainly used as a rescue therapy. In both groups, mRSS, CRP levels and RAI significantly decreased over time. RTX-treated patients showed a greater absolute mRSS improvement, in line with higher baseline skin scores. No treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in either group; one death and one discontinuation due to inefficacy were observed in the TCZ group. Among SSc-ILD patients, FVC% showed a modest decline in both groups, while DLCO% remained overall stable, and only a few patients met the OMERACT criteria for functional progression. Conclusions: In this real-world, single-center cohort of SSc patients, both agents were associated with a positive impact on disease activity, with a low rate of lung progression and with favorable safety profiles. Owing to substantial baseline imbalances and confounding by indication, between-group comparisons do not allow firm conclusions on comparative effectiveness. Overall, these data support the use of both agents in different clinical scenarios.
More Related Videos
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
07:25In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...