Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron OxyHydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
Removal Performance and Mechanistic Insights into As(V) Transport in Natural Manganese Minerals
Zhicheng Zhao1,2, Huimei Shan1,2, Song Wei1,2
1Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China.
Abstract:
Arsenic contamination in polymetallic mining areas is closely linked to surrounding iron-rich manganese minerals. However, conclusive evidence remains limited regarding the retention and migration process of As(V) in naturally manganese-rich manganese ores (especially those with different manganese/iron mass ratios) under dynamic flow conditions. This study investigated As(V) adsorption and transport by four natural manganese minerals (FM1-FM4) through batch/column experiments, characterization, and numerical modeling. Their Mn/Fe mass ratios were 22.7 for FM1, 4.2 for FM2, 3.7 for FM3, and 16.4 for FM4. Batch experiments showed that As(V) adsorption on FM1-FM3 was better described by the Freundlich model, indicating heterogeneous adsorption behavior. Under the tested experimental conditions, the apparent Langmuir qm values of these minerals decreased from 0.066 to 0.015 mmol·g-1 with decreasing Mn/Fe ratio. However, As(V) adsorption on FM4, which had the lowest Mn and Fe contents, followed the Langmuir model (qm = 0.012 mmol·g-1), suggesting monolayer adsorption. Column experiments demonstrated rapid As(V) retention for all minerals. In the time domain, increasing the flow rate from 0.5 to 2.0 mL·min-1 generally advanced breakthrough and shortened the desorption tail, although the breakthrough behavior expressed in pore-volume coordinates was not strictly monotonic for all minerals. The Two-Site Kinetic Attachment Model (TSKAM) successfully simulated these dynamics (R2 > 0.90, RMSE < 0.05), revealing adsorption controlled by fast and slow kinetic sites, with slow-site contributions diminishing at higher flow rates. Characterization results indicated that adsorbed arsenic on FM1 remained mainly as As(V) and was immobilized primarily through surface complexation involving surface hydroxyl and Fe/Mn-O groups. XRD and SEM-EDS suggested the participation of Fe/Mn-bearing phases, while XPS on FM1 showed pronounced changes in Mn surface species during adsorption. Therefore, As(V) removal by these natural manganese minerals is a coupled physicochemical process influenced by both mineral properties, including Mn/Fe ratio, specific surface area, pore structure, pHPZC, and Mn surface-state changes, and hydrodynamic conditions in the polymetallic mining areas.
More Related Videos
09:02Manganese Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis by Thermal Decomposition of ManganeseII Acetylacetonate
Published on: June 18, 2020
10:31Detection and Recovery of Palladium, Gold and Cobalt Metals from the Urban Mine Using Novel Sensors/Adsorbents Designated with Nanoscale Wagon-wheel-shaped Pores
Published on: December 6, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Microbes and Other Elemental Cycles
Voltammetry: Stripping Methods
Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV)
ASV is used to determine metals and metalloids at trace levels. It involves two steps: deposition and stripping. First, a negative potential is applied to the...
Sulfur Assimilation
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Formation of Complex Ions
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium