Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026
Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
Published on: March 12, 2011
Da Vinci Single-Port Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: First European Experiences
Ernest Kaufmann1,2, Silvan Sigg3,4, David Jan Thomas Abt1
1Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Introduction:
Single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (SP-RAPN) is an emerging minimally invasive technique for nephron-sparing surgery, offering potential advantages in confined anatomical spaces. While initial data from the USA are promising, European experiences remain sparse. Here, we present early European experiences of transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients undergoing SP-RAPN and compared perioperative outcomes of TP and RP approaches.
Results:
Within the first 15 months after implementation of the SP system, 61 patients underwent SP-RAPN (31 TP, 30 RP) without open conversion. Tumors treated via the TP approach were significantly larger (42 vs. 26 mm, p < 0.001). RP was associated with shorter median operative time (170 vs. 222 min, p = 0.008), lower estimated blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, p = 0.002), and shorter length of hospital stay (2 vs. 2 days [IQR 2-2 vs. 2-3], p = 0.002), while warm ischemia time was comparable (21 vs. 22 min, p = 0.4). Positive surgical margins (TP 3% case vs. RP 0%, p > 0.9) and postoperative bleeding requiring embolization (TP 1 case 3% vs. RP 0%, p > 0.9) were not significantly different between groups. Besides this one case requiring embolization, no further Clavien-Dindo grade >II complication was observed within 90 days.
Conclusion:
Within the first 15 months, SP-RAPN showed promising feasibility, safety, and early oncological outcomes using either the TP or RP approach.
