Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Concurrent validity and agreement of Bayley-4, AIMS, and HINE assessments in 1-year-old children
Weiyang Deng1, Bahda Hoang1, Meaghan Rubsam1,2
1Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
The Bayley-4 gross motor subtest shows strong validity against the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Both assessments effectively identify atypical development in infants, supporting the Bayley-4
Area of Science:
- Pediatric developmental assessment
- Infant motor development
- Neurological examination
Background:
- Accurate developmental assessment is crucial for early intervention.
- The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-4) is a widely used tool.
- Its concurrent validity and agreement with other measures, like the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), require examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the concurrent validity between the Bayley-4 gross motor subtest and the AIMS.
- To evaluate agreement among the Bayley-4 (full and gross motor subtest), AIMS, and HINE in identifying atypical development at 12 months.
- To benchmark these assessments against each other.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional observational study involving 123 infants (approx. 12 months old) with varied risk profiles.
- Concurrent validity assessed using Spearman's rank correlation.
- Agreement evaluated using Cohen's kappa (k) and typicality thresholds.
Main Results:
- Strong correlation (r=0.90) between Bayley-4 gross motor subtest and AIMS.
- Substantial agreement between Bayley-4 (full/gross motor) and AIMS (k=0.72-0.73).
- Fair agreement between Bayley-4 and HINE (k=0.28-0.32), and between AIMS and HINE (k=0.34).
Conclusions:
- The Bayley-4 demonstrates concurrent validity and agreement, supporting its use in clinical and home settings.
- The Bayley-4 aligns more closely with motor-focused assessments (AIMS) than neurological ones (HINE).
- This study provides initial evidence for the Bayley-4's reliability in developmental assessment.
Aim:
To examine concurrent validity between the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-4) gross motor subtest and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), and evaluate agreement among the Bayley-4 (full test and gross motor subtest), AIMS, and Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) in identifying atypical development at 12 months of age.
Method:
This cross-sectional observational study included Bayley-4, AIMS, and HINE scores from 123 children (56 females, 67 males) with varied risk profiles at approximately 12 months of age. Concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation of raw scores. Agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa (k) and evidence-based thresholds of typicality for each assessment. Additional assessment comparisons, including AIMS and HINE, were conducted for benchmarking.
Results:
The Bayley-4 gross motor subtest was strongly correlated (r = 0.90, p < 0.01) with the AIMS. Both the Bayley-4 full test and gross motor subtest demonstrated substantial agreement with the AIMS 5th centile (k = 0.72-0.73) and fair agreement (k = 0.28-0.32) with the HINE. By comparison, the AIMS and HINE were moderately correlated (r = 0.48), with fair agreement (k = 0.34).
Interpretation:
This study provides the first evidence of concurrent validity and agreement for the Bayley-4, supporting its use as a reliable developmental assessment in clinical and home settings. The Bayley-4 aligned more closely with the motor-focused AIMS than with the neurologically focused HINE.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Reliability and Validity
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...