Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of sit-less and move-more interventions within Australian primary
Aaron Beecroft1, David Dunstan1,2, Shannon Sahlqvist1
1Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Background:
Due to the excessive burden and health costs of noncommunicable diseases, public health and clinical practice guidelines emphasize the importance of targeting population changes in risk factors of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Primary healthcare presents a pragmatic setting for embedding interventions targeting sitting less and moving more. However, to design effective implementation strategies for such interventions, it is necessary to understand the determinants that drive implementation in this setting.
Purpose:
To determine the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of sit-less and move-more interventions within Australian primary healthcare, as perceived by general practitioners and general practice nurses.
Methods:
Ten general practitioners and 10 general practice nurses completed online semi-structured individual interviews. Interviews were digitally transcribed and analyzed deductively; both the interview guide and analysis were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Results:
All domains within the Theoretical Domains Framework were represented. Notable barrier domains were: Environmental Context and Resources, related to reported time constraints; Skills, relating to limited formal training; Social Influences, relating to patient engagement challenges. Notable facilitator domains were: Beliefs about Consequences, reflecting perceived health benefits for patients with healthier movement behaviors, Environmental Context and Resources, including use of educational resources and integration of sit-less and move-more assessments within clinic workflows; and Social/Professional Role and Identity, highlighting how both general practitioners and general practice nurses have a role in implementation.
Conclusions:
These findings provide a foundation for future research focusing on the co-design of strategies supporting the implementation of such interventions within primary healthcare.
More Related Videos
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
07:27Exergaming in Older People Living with HIV Improves Balance, Mobility and Ameliorates Some Aspects of Frailty
Published on: October 6, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
