Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Electrical cardioversion in patients with left ventricular thrombus: A systematic review of safety and thromboembolic
Carlson Sama1, Muchi Ditah Chobufo2, Ademola Ajibade3
1Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, West Virginia University Hospital, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Insights
Electrical cardioversion for left-ventricular (LV) thrombus appears safe, with no observed thromboembolic events in a systematic review. Individualized, imaging-guided decisions with anticoagulation are recommended.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Thrombosis Research
Background:
- The thromboembolic risk associated with electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus remains unclear, leading to inconsistent clinical practices.
- This systematic review aims to consolidate reported thromboembolic outcomes following cardioversion in individuals with imaging-confirmed LV thrombus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and synthesize data on thromboembolic outcomes after electrical cardioversion in patients diagnosed with left-ventricular thrombus.
- To provide evidence-based insights for clinical decision-making regarding cardioversion in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus up to July 25, 2025.
- Studies reporting outcomes after direct-current or internal electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus were included; case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded.
- The primary endpoint was the occurrence of clinically apparent thromboembolic complications, with data synthesized narratively.
Main Results:
- Three retrospective studies involving 68 patients with imaging-proven LV thrombus met the inclusion criteria.
- While most thrombi were fixed, approximately 8% were mobile in one study. Anticoagulation varied, with 21% receiving none prior to cardioversion.
- No thromboembolic events directly linked to electrical cardioversion were observed across a follow-up period ranging from 3 months to 1 year.
Conclusions:
- Limited evidence suggests that electrical cardioversion may not lead to clinically overt thromboembolic events in patients with known LV thrombus.
- Clinical decisions should be individualized, guided by imaging, optimized anticoagulation, and multidisciplinary consultation.
- Further research is warranted to definitively establish the safety profile and optimize management strategies.
Background:
The thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion in patients with left-ventricular (LV) thrombus is poorly defined, producing variable clinical practice. We performed a systematic review to synthesize reported thromboembolic outcomes after cardioversion in patients with imaging-documented LV thrombus.
Methods:
We searched PubMed and Scopus through 25 July 2025 for studies reporting outcomes after external direct-current cardioversion or internal/intra-procedural electrical shocks in patients with known LV thrombus. Case reports and pharmacological cardioversion studies were excluded. The primary outcome was clinically apparent thromboembolic complications. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively.
Results:
Three retrospective studies met criteria, comprising 68 patients with known, imaging-proven LV thrombus. Thrombus morphology was predominantly laminated/fixed, but about 8% of patients had mobile thrombi in one series. Anticoagulation practices varied; a subset (21%) had no anticoagulation prior to electrical cardioversion. In total, 60 patients underwent direct-current cardioversion while eight patients underwent multiple internal intra-procedural cardioversions in the setting of known LV thrombus. Overall, no thromboembolic events directly attributable to cardioversion were observed over a follow-up period of 3 months to 1 year.
Conclusion:
Available evidence, although limited, did not identify clinically overt thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion in patients with known LV thrombus. Decisions should, however, be individualized, imaging-guided, accompanied by optimized anticoagulation whenever possible and multidisciplinary discussions.
More Related Videos
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Electroconvulsive Therapy