Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 29, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
S-shaped Utility Maximization with VaR Constraint and Partial Information
Dongmei Zhu1, Ashley Davey2, Harry Zheng2
1School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nangjing, China.
This study addresses S-shaped utility maximization under a Value at Risk (VaR) constraint with an unknown drift. A critical wealth level determines problem feasibility and solution uniqueness, with algorithms proposed for practical application.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Finance
- Mathematical Economics
- Decision Theory
Background:
- Standard utility maximization models often assume known parameters and lack risk constraints.
- Incorporating Value at Risk (VaR) constraints and unobservable parameters presents significant analytical challenges.
- S-shaped utility functions capture realistic, non-monotonic risk preferences, but complicate optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a framework for S-shaped utility maximization subject to a VaR constraint and an unobservable drift coefficient.
- To derive conditions for the existence and uniqueness of optimal solutions and Lagrange multipliers.
- To propose and evaluate computational methods for solving this complex financial optimization problem.
Main Methods:
- Bayesian filtering to handle the unobservable drift coefficient.
- Concavification principle to manage the non-concave S-shaped utility function.
- Change of measure techniques for risk-neutral pricing and duality.
- Semi-closed integral representation for the dual value function.
Main Results:
- A critical wealth level is identified, determining the feasibility and uniqueness of the constrained optimization problem.
- A semi-closed integral form for the dual value function is derived.
- The study establishes conditions for the existence of a unique optimal solution and Lagrange multiplier.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework provides a robust method for analyzing optimal investment under complex utility preferences and risk constraints.
- The identified critical wealth level offers practical insights for portfolio management and risk assessment.
- The comparison of Lagrange, simulation, and deep neural network algorithms demonstrates the tractability of the problem with modern computational techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Expected Value
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
