Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.5K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.5K
Distance Problem01:29

Distance Problem

216
When an object's velocity changes over time, the total distance traveled can be determined by summing small displacement intervals over short increments. This approach approximates the true distance through numerical summation and the use of integral calculus. An estimate of the total displacement can be obtained by measuring velocity at regular intervals and multiplying each value by the corresponding time step.If a runner accelerates over the first three seconds of a race, speed measurements...
216
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

7.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
7.7K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

624
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
624
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

429
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
429
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

851
The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...
851

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare Utilization Among Youth in the Child Welfare System.

Children and youth services review·2026
Same author

The rumination severity index: Development and evaluation of a scoring tool for rumination syndrome.

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition·2026
Same author

Safety and efficacy of droxidopa for dysautonomia in adults with Menkes disease and occipital horn syndrome in the USA: a randomised phase 1/2a crossover trial.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

An AI-based chatbot to support health-related social needs among pediatric primary care population: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Promoting sustained behavior change and nutrition security in medicaid-enrolled individuals with stage 2 cardiovascular kidney metabolic syndrome (CKMS): Protocol of the SUSTAIN study.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Effects of the Exercise Is Medicine Program on Biopsychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes in Individuals with Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Improving Power of the Win Ratio Analysis through Distance-based Weights.

Md Rejuan Haque1,2, Madison Hyer2, Lai Wei1,2

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|April 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new win ratio method for clinical trials, enhancing statistical power by incorporating covariate information. The proposed approach improves analysis of composite endpoints when covariates are linked to outcomes.

Keywords:
composite endpointdistancepowerweightwin ratio

More Related Videos

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • The win ratio method is popular for analyzing composite endpoints in clinical trials.
  • Existing methods have limitations in incorporating covariate information.
  • Prioritization of composite outcome components is a key feature of the win ratio.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the win ratio method by incorporating covariate information.
  • To improve the statistical power of the win ratio when covariates are associated with outcomes.
  • To develop a weighted win ratio approach based on covariate distances.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a weighted win ratio method incorporating covariate values.
  • Assigned weights to wins/losses based on the distance between compared pairs using covariates.
  • Evaluated the method through detailed simulation studies and real data analyses.

Main Results:

  • The proposed weighted win ratio method demonstrated increased power when covariates were associated with composite outcome components.
  • Simulation studies confirmed the enhanced performance of the new method.
  • The method performed comparably to the original win ratio when covariates lacked association with outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The covariate-weighted win ratio method is a valuable extension for analyzing composite endpoints.
  • This approach offers improved statistical power in clinical trials where relevant covariates are available.
  • The method provides a robust alternative for composite endpoint analysis, especially when covariates influence outcomes.