Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Navon: Different designs of local-global tasks capture different bias effects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

A collaborative guide to Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT): Methods, insights, and recommendations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Imaging the spatiotemporal dynamics of covert attention with a pupillometric probing paradigm.

iScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

78.0K

Inhibition of Return without Preparatory Suppression in Spatial Priority Maps.

Dirk van Moorselaar1, Vicky Voet2, Stefan Van der Stigchel2

  • 1Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands dirkvanmoorselaar@gmail.com.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|April 28, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Inhibition of return (IOR) causes slower responses to previously cued locations, but this study found no evidence of sustained suppression in spatial priority maps. Behavioral IOR appears to arise from motor or response-level mechanisms, not perceptual filtering.

Keywords:
EEGIORattentioneye movements

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

78.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention Research
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual attention utilizes spatial priority maps to enhance attended locations and suppress distractors.
  • The role of these maps in sustained suppression of ignored locations, particularly in Inhibition of Return (IOR), remains debated.
  • IOR, characterized by slower responses to previously cued locations, presents a key test for sustained suppression mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether spatial priority maps maintain sustained suppression at ignored locations during the anticipatory interval of Inhibition of Return (IOR).
  • To determine if IOR reflects genuine priority map suppression or operates via motor/response-level mechanisms.
  • To challenge the assumption that behavioral suppression directly reflects anticipatory reconfiguration of spatial priority.

Main Methods:

  • Combined a spatial cueing paradigm with inverted encoding models applied to electroencephalography (EEG) data.
  • Reconstructed spatially selective channel tuning functions (CTFs) during the anticipatory interval.
  • Analyzed behavioral saccadic responses and neural activity across different frequency bands.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed robust behavioral IOR, with slower saccadic responses to previously cued locations.
  • Found no evidence of below-baseline suppression in cortical spatial priority maps across individual frequency bands during IOR.
  • Demonstrated that placeholders modulated behavioral IOR but not anticipatory spatial tuning.

Conclusions:

  • Behavioral IOR arises independently of sustained suppression within cortical spatial priority maps.
  • Inhibition during IOR likely operates via motor/response-level mechanisms rather than perceptual down-weighting.
  • Findings challenge the view that behavioral suppression reflects anticipatory spatial priority map reconfiguration.