Multi-objective inventory optimization using reinforcement learning: a comparative study on profitability and carbon emissions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Abdulrahman Sorour1, Yomna Sadek2, Mohamed Elshalakani3
1Design and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, 1 El Sarayat St., Abbasseya, El Weili, 11535, Cairo Governorate, Egypt. abdo.sorour2000@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Inventory management is a core part of supply chains, and over the years it has been increasingly challenged by the need to balance economic performance with environmental considerations. While prior reinforcement learning (RL) studies have incorporated carbon emissions indirectly through cost penalties or regulatory constraints, this work addresses an existing gap by treating emissions as an independent optimization objective. This study examines RL as an adaptive decision‑making approach for inventory optimization with two objectives: maximizing profit and minimizing carbon emissions. The problem is formulated as a Markov Decision Process, and four RL algorithms Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Phasic Policy Gradient (PPG), Advantage Actor‑Critic (A2C), and Double Deep Q‑Network (DDQN) are evaluated under identical experimental conditions. Carbon emissions are explicitly modeled in the reward function rather than embedded within operating costs. The results show that PPG achieves the highest profitability with only a modest increase in emissions, while DDQN converges faster but yields lower profit overall. Sensitivity analysis indicates that reward weighting strongly influences policy behavior, with PPO providing the most stable trade‑off between profitability and emissions.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Methods of Medium Optimization
Optimal Foraging
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Production Efficiency
