Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

417
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
417
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

407
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
407
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.3K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

7.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
7.5K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Joint Bayesian Hidden Markov Model With Subject-Specific Transitions for Wearable Sensor Data.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

The Association Between Stimulant Medication Use and Mortality.

Journal of clinical psychopharmacology·2025
Same author

TENSOR REGRESSION FOR INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS WITH APPLICATION TO LONGITUDINAL STUDIES.

The annals of applied statistics·2024
Same author

Application of microbubble air flotation to harvest Microcystis sp. from agriculture wastewater: The regulation and mechanisms.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2024
Same author

Mixed-Response State-Space Model for Analyzing Multi-Dimensional Digital Phenotypes.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2024
Same author

Efficient Binocular Rendering of Volumetric Density Fields With Coupled Adaptive Cube-Map Ray Marching for Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2023
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K

An enhanced exact permutation rank-based inferential seamless phase 2/3 design.

Tianchen Xu1, Xin Wang2, Ivan S F Chan1

  • 1Data & Quantitative Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Madison, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|April 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel permutation rank-based method for seamless phase 2/3 adaptive trials. This approach enhances statistical power and controls type I error rates, improving drug development efficiency.

Keywords:
Seamless phase 2/3 designdose selectionmultiplicity adjustmentpermutation rank-basedtype I error control

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

41.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

16.5K
Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
13:33

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications

Published on: November 19, 2013

41.3K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacometrics

Background:

  • Seamless phase 2/3 adaptive designs combine dose optimization and confirmatory analysis, accelerating drug development.
  • Challenges include type I error inflation and unknown correlations between short-term biomarkers and long-term efficacy.
  • Existing multiplicity adjustment methods can be conservative, leading to reduced statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an efficient permutation rank-based method for seamless phase 2/3 adaptive designs.
  • To address type I error inflation and power loss associated with dose selection in adaptive trials.
  • To preserve the correlation structure between biomarkers and efficacy endpoints without explicit estimation.

Main Methods:

  • A novel permutation rank-based method is proposed.
  • The method preserves the correlation structure between biomarkers and efficacy endpoints.
  • Simulations and an oncology case study were used for validation.

Main Results:

  • The permutation rank-based method robustly controls family-wise error rates.
  • The proposed method achieves uniformly higher statistical power compared to existing methods.
  • The method demonstrated efficacy in an oncology trial using progression-free survival.

Conclusions:

  • The permutation rank-based method offers an efficient solution for seamless phase 2/3 adaptive designs.
  • This approach enhances statistical power while maintaining type I error control.
  • The method provides a valuable tool for optimizing drug development in clinical trials.