Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

08:16
Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
Published on: March 13, 2014
17.7K
Local Resource Availability and Subsidy Flow Mediate the Effects of Disturbances in Meta-Ecosystems
Lynn Govaert1,2,3, Jessica Colombo1,2, Florian Altermatt1,2
1Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Ecology and Evolution
|April 29, 2026
Summary
Disturbance impacts freshwater protist communities differently based on local resources and connected ecosystem flows. High-resource areas resist disturbance, while low-resource areas benefit from subsidies, mitigating negative effects.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Environmental Science
- Freshwater Biology
Background:
- Human activities intensify disturbance regimes, necessitating understanding of their ecological impacts.
- Landscape heterogeneity, including resource availability and meta-ecosystem flows, can mediate disturbance effects.
- Connected meta-ecosystems are common, yet their role in disturbance response is understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how disturbance intensity affects biomass and community dynamics in connected freshwater protist meta-ecosystems.
- To determine if local resource availability and cross-ecosystem subsidy flow mitigate disturbance impacts.
Main Methods:
- Utilized highly replicated experimental microcosms simulating two-patch meta-ecosystems.
- Manipulated local resource availability (low vs. high carbon release) and meta-ecosystem subsidy flow (detritus and nutrient movement).
- Assessed the effects of varying disturbance intensities on protist community biomass and dynamics.
Main Results:
- High-resource ecosystems maintained biomass regardless of subsidy flow when disturbed.
- Low-resource ecosystems experienced significant biomass decline with increased disturbance.
- Subsidy flow from high-resource to low-resource ecosystems partially mitigated disturbance-induced biomass loss in low-resource patches.
Conclusions:
- Disturbance effects are context-dependent, influenced by local resource levels and inter-ecosystem subsidy flow.
- Spatial heterogeneity and cross-ecosystem subsidies are crucial factors for understanding community responses to disturbance.
- Management strategies for mitigating disturbance impacts should consider landscape heterogeneity and resource subsidies.
Keywords:
cross‐ecosystem flowdisturbancemeta‐ecosystem ecologymicrocosm experimentprotozoasubsidy flowMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Disturbance
16.1K
An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.
16.1K
Habitat Fragmentation
15.7K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
15.7K
Ecological Niches
22.3K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
22.3K
Marine Microbial Ecology
66
Marine microbial ecosystems are shaped by distinct physicochemical limits, including high salinity, low nutrient availability, and fluctuating oxygen levels. These conditions favor smaller microbial cell sizes, which maximize their surface-to-volume ratio for efficient nutrient uptake.Microbial activity and community composition are closely linked to biogeochemical cycles, particularly in dynamic environments like estuaries, where halotolerant microbes thrive in response to variable salinity...
66
Freshwater Microbial Ecology
58
Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic...
58
Ecological Succession
19.2K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
19.2K

