Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

9.1K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
9.1K
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

1.6K
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
1.6K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.0K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

729
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
729
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

595
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
595

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A digital twin methodology using retrospective patient data for sample size reduction in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

Design of Bayesian Clinical Trials With Clustered Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A digital twin methodology using real patient data for sample size reduction in Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled clinical trials.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Two-stage Bayesian network meta-analysis of individualized treatment rules for multiple treatments with siloed data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Use of Bayesian techniques in clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: a scoping review.

BMC rheumatology·2025
Same author

Training the next generation of clinical trial biostatisticians.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K

Discussion on ''Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference'' by Susanne Dandl and Torsten Hothorn.

Shirin Golchi1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.

Biometrics
|April 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This commentary discusses a new covariate-adjusted model for marginal treatment effects in clinical trials. The approach is shown to be applicable and beneficial for Bayesian clinical trials and decision-making.

Keywords:
Bayesian decision criteriaassurancedesign prior

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 30, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.1K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • The "Nonparanormal Adjusted Marginal Inference" paper by Dandl and Hothorn introduces a novel covariate-adjusted model.
  • This model explicitly formulates the marginal treatment effect, crucial for clinical trial analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide commentary on the proposed covariate-adjusted model.
  • To highlight the model's applicability and utility within the framework of Bayesian clinical trials.
  • To demonstrate the model's value in specifying research hypotheses and Bayesian decision criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion and commentary on the Dandl and Hothorn paper.
  • Application of the proposed model to Bayesian clinical trial design.
  • Illustrative example demonstrating the model's utility.

Main Results:

  • The proposed covariate-adjusted model is applicable to Bayesian clinical trials.
  • The model facilitates meaningful specification of research hypotheses.
  • The model aids in defining Bayesian decision criteria.

Conclusions:

  • The novel covariate-adjusted model offers significant advantages for Bayesian clinical trial design.
  • The approach enhances the meaningfulness of hypothesis specification and decision-making in Bayesian trials.