Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
A New Model for Youth-Driven Community Change: Exploratory Testing of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Citizen
Eduardo De la Vega-Taboada1,2, Sofia A Portillo1, Lina Maria Gomez-Garcia3
1Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools can support youth-led citizen science by providing structured feedback and visualizations. Facilitator guidance and real-time review are key to refining feasible solutions and managing AI outputs effectively.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Citizen Science
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Generative AI (artificial intelligence) is increasingly used in community settings, but its role in youth-led participatory frameworks is understudied.
- Large language models and AI image tools offer potential for structured feedback and visual prototyping.
- Risks include output variability, feasibility gaps, and potential displacement of youth agency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine generative AI tools (GPT model feedback and AI image transformation) as deliberative and visualization supports.
- To assess their function within a youth-led citizen science intervention for environmental health in Cartagena, Colombia.
Main Methods:
- Exploratory action research with preparation and implementation phases.
- Iterative testing of SecureGPT and DALL-E/Adobe Photoshop AI with a 3-3-5 prompt format.
- Facilitator-mediated AI use with 12 adolescent citizen scientists in a real-time, group review process.
Main Results:
- Structured GPT prompts enhanced critical analysis and intervention feasibility.
- AI image tools (Adobe Photoshop AI) generated plausible prototypes aiding discussion, but required careful framing to manage feasibility gaps.
- Facilitator guidance and prompt refinement were crucial for managing AI output variability and specificity.
Conclusions:
- Generative AI tools functioned as supports, not decision-makers, in a facilitated participatory context.
- A workflow involving structured prompting, real-time review, and oversight helps refine feasible solutions and stakeholder communication in citizen science.
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
The Scientific Method
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...